Skip to main content

The Beginning of Grand Strategy

The Birth of A Genre
How Risk made an industry.

Albert Lamorisse, a French film maker under a game company with an affiliation with the Parker Brothers, made history in 1957, when he published the first real strategy game. It was at the time called “La Conquete du Monde” or in English, “The Conqueror of the World”.

But before we dive into “Conquete Du Monde”, we must dive through his life up until this point, to explore the mind behind this classic game.
Image result for Albert Lamorisse
Albert Lamorisse, Inventor of Risk

Born in Paris in 1922, not much is out there on his early life. He found most of his success after World War 2, when he directed Rim (Although, it wasn’t very popular). This was his first step into the film industry. Although he really came into his prime after “The White Mane” a film about young boys who find an untamable white stallion, and then blew up with his short film “The Red Balloon”.

This is purely speculation, but I believe that World War 2 was a major inspiration for Risk. The dice roll adds a factor of “Risk” to it. Okay I'll stop. But In World War two, many important battles were decided by unknowns., Barbarossa’s failure was due in a large part to chance, and even the territories resemble World War 2 borders to a certain extent. But keep in mind, this is pure speculation.

In 1957, with the original publishing of Risk, the Grand Strategy genre was born. If you look at this tree, you can see that most of the early games were derived from board games that were direct descendants of Risk.
Svea Rike and Civilization both started as board games, and they gave birth to the biggest grand strategy games there are;
Civilization, and the Paradox series. Civilization as a board game was over complicated, but made an amazing video game, and Svea Rike hit the sweet spot with complexity. In the next essay, we will dive into the events and the people who started the jump into computer gaming

Labels:

Comments

  1. UnknownNovember 11, 2017 at 7:14 AM

    You seem to only care about PDS titles without taking into account the various other developers/publishers that did Grand Strategy and 4x games. For this, I really cant take this essay seriously without farther investigation on your part and understanding of the evolution of the genre as a whole. I hate to be the one to state that, but its a reasonable blurt, but centered upon PDS as the last point. To me that is flying in the face of many others that came before/during/and will come after PDS. You can take my suggestion/criticism as you like, but know it was not stated in malus.

    ReplyDelete
  2. jaenelajacquettaMarch 4, 2022 at 12:30 PM

    Casino Player Benefits: Can You Deposit in a Casino? - Dr.
    A casino player benefits from 인천광역 출장샵 paying a certain amount to the 보령 출장샵 player, and 화성 출장안마 then paying for a certain amount 안성 출장마사지 to the 1xbet 먹튀 player. It is a great way to learn

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Art of In-App Purchases

What drives people to make an in-App purchase, and how do you pull them off? In games ranging from Clash of Clans to Bounzy, the devs integrate in-app purchases in some way or the other. So, what exactly pushes people to make these purchases? One major factor that contributes to this is time. A company has to ensure that the user stays engaged for at least 10 minutes, in which they get far enough into the game (In their eyes) that it drives them to come back. Clash of Clans does this, by making buildings take 10 seconds in the beginning, but slowly building the time, it makes people feel like they are far into the game, at least to far to give up. If you can hold their attention, and make them feel accomplished within the first time they sit down with your game, you will make them come back. Another factor to making people purchase, is abstracting the currency. Make it obtainable in small amounts without paying, but not enough to get anything of substance. By purchasing th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Accessibility and Simplicity. Good or Bad?

Is Accessibility good for Grand Strategy? Over the past few years, the genre has placed a special emphasis on “accessibility”. Of course, it's a good business choice, as they need to make money, making it easier to appeal to a large audience isn’t bad, but it takes a lot out of some games. In some games such as Atwar, or Call Of War, their simplicity makes the game so much more enjoyable. One of the things I love about Atwar is that it doesn't add so many mechanics, it knows its purpose. Its goal is to provide a simple strategy game. Their are only 5 things you need to know to get in. Capturing Cities = Money, Fighting in Cities reduces population and thus reduces money, Their are 3 diplomatic relations, (Allied, Peace, and War), if you control the capital the area gets painted your color, and how to move units. The reason it is so simple yet so fun, is it puts it on you, the player, to make dialogue, and you, the player, to choose where to capture cities. If this game...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Plight of The Czech Legion

It  was  July  6th,  1918,  the  dull  cold  hung  in  the  air.  The  people  of  Vladivostok  sat  in  their  houses  and  ate  breakfast,  when  the  Czech  Legion  broke  the  garrison.  Bullets  rang  out,  but  in  a  few  hours,  the  Czech’s  seized  the  port  city  of  Vladivostok.  Declaring  it  an  Allied  Protectorate. All though little is known about this extraordinary unit, its journey across Eurasia had a profound effect on history, which continue to echo into the modern day. The  sounds  of  the  bullets  that  had  just  been  fired  hung  in  the  air  as  people  tried  to  make  sense  of  the  events...
Post a Comment
Read more