Skip to main content

The Evolution of Grand Strategy

The Following is a list of the Essays I will write over the next month to explain the history of Grand Strategy games.










The Evolution of Grand Strategy


  1. The Birth Of A Genre
  2. From Board Games to Computer
  3. The 3 Brothers (Civilization, Svea Rike, and Total War)
  4. Civilization’s influence on the Genre.
  5. The Birth of Defcon
  6. The Rise of Paradox
  7. The 4 Sagas
  8. The New Generation
  9. The Era of Endless DLC
  10. Simplification
  11. The New Revolution
  12. Predictions for the future
  13. The Direction of Grand Strategy
  14. Accessibility, good or bad?
  15. Conclusions  






Games
  1. Risk
  2. Civilization
  3. Svea Rike
  4. Europa Univeralis
  5. Hearts of Iron
  6. Victoria
  7. Crusader Kings
  8. Defcon
  9. Atwar
  10. Real Politik
  11. Superpower 2
  12. Call of War
  13. Masters of the World
In able to Support me, Please donate to https://www.gofundme.com/essay-series-on-grand-strategy-game


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Art of In-App Purchases

What drives people to make an in-App purchase, and how do you pull them off? In games ranging from Clash of Clans to Bounzy, the devs integrate in-app purchases in some way or the other. So, what exactly pushes people to make these purchases? One major factor that contributes to this is time. A company has to ensure that the user stays engaged for at least 10 minutes, in which they get far enough into the game (In their eyes) that it drives them to come back. Clash of Clans does this, by making buildings take 10 seconds in the beginning, but slowly building the time, it makes people feel like they are far into the game, at least to far to give up. If you can hold their attention, and make them feel accomplished within the first time they sit down with your game, you will make them come back. Another factor to making people purchase, is abstracting the currency. Make it obtainable in small amounts without paying, but not enough to get anything of substance. By purchasing th...

Accessibility and Simplicity. Good or Bad?

Is Accessibility good for Grand Strategy? Over the past few years, the genre has placed a special emphasis on “accessibility”. Of course, it's a good business choice, as they need to make money, making it easier to appeal to a large audience isn’t bad, but it takes a lot out of some games. In some games such as Atwar, or Call Of War, their simplicity makes the game so much more enjoyable. One of the things I love about Atwar is that it doesn't add so many mechanics, it knows its purpose. Its goal is to provide a simple strategy game. Their are only 5 things you need to know to get in. Capturing Cities = Money, Fighting in Cities reduces population and thus reduces money, Their are 3 diplomatic relations, (Allied, Peace, and War), if you control the capital the area gets painted your color, and how to move units. The reason it is so simple yet so fun, is it puts it on you, the player, to make dialogue, and you, the player, to choose where to capture cities. If this game...

The Plight of The Czech Legion

It  was  July  6th,  1918,  the  dull  cold  hung  in  the  air.  The  people  of  Vladivostok  sat  in  their  houses  and  ate  breakfast,  when  the  Czech  Legion  broke  the  garrison.  Bullets  rang  out,  but  in  a  few  hours,  the  Czech’s  seized  the  port  city  of  Vladivostok.  Declaring  it  an  Allied  Protectorate. All though little is known about this extraordinary unit, its journey across Eurasia had a profound effect on history, which continue to echo into the modern day. The  sounds  of  the  bullets  that  had  just  been  fired  hung  in  the  air  as  people  tried  to  make  sense  of  the  events...